Liars, Cheaters and Thieves

If there is one thing I cannot stand, my absolute one pet peeve, it's dishonesty. The one thing that people tend not to understand is how honesty and loyalty really goes hand in hand and falls under a category all in it's own. If you feel like you are a loyal individual (generally speaking) a well-rounded, humbled individual.. there are probably laws that are followed by you in order to make you feel like you fall in this category. However, you cannot consider yourself to be this loyal individual if you dish out lies or minor fuck ups every now and again because you think it's ok. Not too much and just enough to subside your low blood sugar level. Regardless of what your laws (what you believe) may be behind your loyalty status, the number 1 Common Law should always be to never lie. Soon after, everything else (cheater and thief!) falls right in line. You can't pick and choose. Either you are going to be an all-around liar/cheater/thief or you are going to live by common law of loyalty. And if your loyalty is just that great for someone or something (so you say), then there should be no problem honoring up to the part that should be played. The part that should consist of all honesty along with the respect for the others personal circumference. But of course, first and foremost, you must be loyal to yourself. Use the common sense God gave you to analyze everything that surrounds you. What makes you happy and your clock tick? Living a lie can't possibly be all that comfortable. It's possible for someone to feed so many lies into others as well as their own brain, that they will actually start believing themselves. A whole new world order can erupt off these culprits alone. Everything is a lie, down to the drawers that they insist are clean. And in the midst of ducking and dodging through these lies, the culprit finds themselves buried alive under what never had to be dug up in the first place. It wasn't ever really time for a funeral.

Liars, cheaters, and thieves! Different words. Different definitions, even. Same person, can't be one without the other. In all fairness of just having simple common sense, why even go through the hassle? It's more work to sit there and rummage through the thought process of what is going to be said and what the outcome may be if THIS "falsified" story is given instead of the real story. Down the path we go where, already, cheating someone out of their time has taken place on top of the faith and trust (which is always given freely), and a small portion of someone's self esteem has been stolen along with a cup of dignity and a side of pride. Why self esteem? Because "culprit" already has in mind that "victim" wouldn't have sense enough to handle the truth in the first place. If "culprit" knew "victim" was that senseless, why even bother to go through the motions? "Culprits" thinking process is a shot to the face on top of the first shot that was blasted when the truth was revealed before the "culprit's" half ass confession; in which, I might add, had to be forced out under surrender. How would "culprit" know what sense "victim" has or what could be handled if the best interest was only in themselves anyway? "Culprit" never once thought about "victim". "Victim" is the victim because they are either too sensitive, crazy, head-strong, anything other than understanding to why they were victimized in the first place. And "culprit" is selfish and continuously performs acts under discretion due to the fact that... it can be done. There's not much else to it. There is no deeper level of thinking, how rough the childhood ventures were, or how horrible past relationships ended. No extra thought process with this one.

If "culprit" decides to be in a relationship and is cheating, why commit to a commitment that will never stand ground due to other needs and wants that are desired and aren't being provided? I repeat: "be loyal to yourself". If "culprit" joins a gang and ends up snitching or leaving one of the bruhs behind in some big shoot-out brawl, then why swear into this brotherhood if the loyalty was never there in the first place and you knew you didn't have the heart for it (or the stomach)? It's like marriage, but only to a bunch of random people and no paperwork. Why go through random situations that can't be talked about? Why should it be a big secret for whoever not to know?

(And let me be clear, I do not mean you did something and you should just go tell the world. This is if a situation arises, and a question is asked.. ie: Victim,"so what store did you go to?" Culprit,"I went to WalMart"... when in fact, culprit went to Sam's Food Club because "victim" saw the receipt. Victims question, after finding out would probably be, "why would you lie? Is that really necessary?" and this is a mere playful example for those that lack common sense)

Think about it, if "culprit" can't share the news with whoever, then a light should come on giving off the image of this action NOT taking place. Isn't it more work for "culprit" in the end if the image is ignored? "Culprit" has to come up with this story, make sure it's being told without the studder, and to remember it just in case it happens to come up again. "Culprit" also has to keep in mind that, more than likely, the story will come up again because "victim" was more affected by the sequence of events that had taken place. Anyone with common sense would think that the average person would rather live their lives free of guilt and extra worries. Especially burdens that are placed on themselves by themselves. And this is where the saying comes into play, "you can't have your cake and eat it too".

Wouldn't it be 10 times more comfy to keep the circle at the original 360 degrees? No gaps. Wouldn't it feel better to be surrounded by people who are worth the time and investment of providing that loyalty and honesty? No one should even want another being around where you feel like you have to do cruel things to, based off of assumptions of how understanding you think the victim would be after committing some retarded ass crime towards them, that is, the victim (let's be clear). Truth be told, if there is a victim anywhere in the circumference, basically, the worth of them is unvaluable. They are taking up space. "Culprits" space. Space that could be filled by one that is valuable enough to be shared with, if the extra time was put into the investment of actually searching for that person rather than settling for "victim" and coming up with new lies. Doesn't have to be lied to, cheated on, or stolen from. Friends, gangs, relationships, hobbies, whatever/whoever should be chosen wisely. A whole new thought process but a way better method of what could prevent a lot of crimes from being committed. Free from having to justify likes or dislikes according to the next person, which ends up being the victim. Free to be yourself not the "culprit". There is always an alternative. An either/or: either it's condoned or it's not. People are made different for a reason. The only hard part is finding one that share resemblences within the 2 parties. Believe it or not, but this makes all the difference in whether or not you will be lied to, cheated on, or stolen from.

I shall return with more honesty. No liars, No cheaters, No thieves allowed!